![]() In any case, the issue with Resolve is the fact that it's an NLE bolted onto a finishing program. The average YouTuber or VLOGer isn't going to care about that, so they probably felt the need to cripple performance to get those people to pay up. For Pro users, the advanced features are enough to get them to upgrade: 10-Bit, Noise Reduction, Optical Flow Retiming, Face Refinement, CODEC Support, etc. They do say that the playback engine in Studio is better on Windows than the Free version, outside of that, though. I'm also not sure why a tool that is so geared towards the professional market felt the need to paywall this feature. Most consumer NLEs do this, as well, so that is not a new concept. They use the Hardware Decoders in the Nvidia or Intel GPUs to Accelerate Decode or Encode. ![]() TLDR it looks like studio and free have the same x.264 acceleration, use optimized media for smooth editing, buying off ebay may not get you the latest Not sure if buying an old dongle will help you get a current version. All other resolve dongles are $299, the same price as buying from B&H or Adorama (or adorama via Amazon if you prefer). Looking on ebay I'm only seeing used Dongles in the $225 price range that only say version 9,10,11,12. I render optimized media Quarter size (which is fine for editing). If you want buttery smooth editing of UHD video, just use Optimized Media. See above, but the Free version can play back straight video smooth but effects and jumping in the timeline isn't instant like with HD or other format footage. I am using a 6Gb GTX1060 and a 6 core Xeon x5670 with 18Gb of RAM and a SSD.ĭoes the GPU acceleration make it buttery smooth? ![]() I should also note that video plays back smooth but it does stutter occaisionally and almost always when jumping around the timeline, and if I have any effects enabled it all goes to crap. This leads me to believe that maybe its partially accelerated. I'm still using Free and when I play back a x.264 UHD clip in my timeline, I see about 25-35% GPU utilization, but all 6 cores (12 threads) go to about 60-65% utilization. If I understand what you're asking:ĭoes the Studio version have GPU acceleration that the free version doesn't?įrom what I read, Studio and Free should have it. I think your phrasing is confusing answers. If I buy an activation key do I still need a dongle? Is it worth getting a dongle anymore? Can you buy a used dongle off eBay and just plug it in and have it work? ![]() I'm getting mixed signals about the need for a dongle or I can choose and activation key. The best of my understanding is that if I drop a clip or edit a clip in the timeline, it will be rendered in the playback almost instantly and be smooth with no freezing of frames while I'm trying to watch my preview.Īlso I wanted to know how to purchase the studio version. I could not find any actual examples of what this actively improves. my question is what exactly does this affect? like will it be only when I hit render, or will it be when I'm actively editing? people say it is buttery-smooth, but I don't know what exactly it is that they are referring to being buttery-smooth in comparison. I see a lot of people talking about the h264 (de?)encoder being way faster because the encoding goes off of the GPU, not to Windows OS decoding. I had questions about the free version vs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |